KnowledgeInSight
Phenomenology for Consciousness Studies
0% of Course 4 complete

Course 4 of 4

From Phenomenology to Consciousness Studies

Carry phenomenology into today's science and philosophy of mind. You'll trace how Merleau-Ponty's ideas shaped Hubert Dreyfus's critique of artificial intelligence, the enactive approach of Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch, 4E cognition, and neurophenomenology. You'll then survey the hard problem of consciousness, the leading responses and scientific theories, and the argument of Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson that science has a "blind spot" about experience. You'll finish ready to take a clear, phenomenologically informed position in current debates.

3 modules · 10 lessons · 96 items · 13h 10m

Start Course 4

Who this is for

You'll get the most out of this course if you can explain core phenomenological ideas, such as intentionality, the lived body, and motor intentionality, in your own words. Familiarity with basic philosophy of mind is helpful but not required.

What you will learn

  • Explain how phenomenology shaped embodied cognition, enactivism, and neurophenomenology
  • Compare major responses to the hard problem and leading scientific theories of consciousness
  • Evaluate the blind spot argument and what it means for the science of consciousness
  • Formulate a phenomenologically informed position on a current debate

Contents

  1. Module 1 From Phenomenology to the Embodied Mind 3 lessons

    Trace how phenomenology moved into cognitive science: Hubert Dreyfus's critique of symbolic AI, the enactive approach of Varela, Thompson, and Rosch, 4E cognition, and neurophenomenology. You'll learn the core claims of each approach, how they draw on Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, and where they disagree with one another. These frameworks shape current research on AI, perception, and the science of consciousness, so they're essential for reading that literature critically.

    1. 1.1Embodied Mind: Dreyfus and the Critique of AI1h 3m
    2. 1.2Embodied Mind: Enactivism and 4E Cognition1h 3m
    3. 1.3Embodied Mind: Neurophenomenology1h 33m
  2. Module 2 The Hard Problem and Theories of Consciousness 4 lessons

    Survey the central debates in consciousness studies: the hard problem and the explanatory gap, the major philosophical responses, and the leading scientific theories of consciousness. You'll compare physicalism, illusionism, panpsychism, and dualism; learn the aims of global workspace, integrated information, higher-order, and predictive processing theories; and evaluate what phenomenology contributes to these debates. You'll finish able to read current consciousness research critically and place new claims within the field.

    1. 2.1Hard Problem: The Explanatory Gap1h 3m
    2. 2.2Hard Problem: Responses1h 3m
    3. 2.3Hard Problem: Scientific Theories1h 3m
    4. 2.4Hard Problem: Phenomenology's Contribution1h 33m
  3. Module 3 Experience and Science: The Blind Spot 3 lessons

    Examine the argument of Adam Frank, Marcelo Gleiser, and Evan Thompson that science has a "blind spot": it forgets the lived experience that makes it possible. You'll learn the key ideas of The Blind Spot, trace their roots in Husserl's critique of the sciences and Merleau-Ponty's primacy of perception, and weigh the main criticisms of the book. You'll finish by formulating your own phenomenologically informed position on a current question in consciousness studies.

    1. 3.1Blind Spot: The Argument1h 3m
    2. 3.2Blind Spot: Roots and Critics1h 3m
    3. 3.3Blind Spot: Forming Your Position1h 33m

Course project

Consciousness Position Paper In this project, you'll write a position paper that takes a phenomenologically informed stance on a live question in consciousness studies, such as AI consciousness, disorders of consciousness, the self, or animal experience. You'll map the rival positions… 3 items · 1h 10m